Speaker kills bill criticized as detrimental to solar, wind energy usage

By Lesley Weidenbener

INDIANAPOLIS – The leader of the Indiana House has killed a bill that critics say would have depressed the use of solar and other alternative energies.

House Speaker Brian Bosma, R-Indianapolis, pulled the bill off the calendar Tuesday, a key deadline for action.

“There are a whole variety of issues that have arisen around it and it just seemed to be a little weighty,” Bosma said.

House Bill 1320, authored by Rep. Eric Koch, R-Bedford, would have established a fixed rate to be paid by all alternative energy users and reduced the amount of credit the utility would give those customers for extra power they produce and put on the grid.

More than 100 Hoosiers – most in opposition to the bill – filled a committee room and an adjacent overflow space last week to testify and listen to discussion on the issue. But most were turned away without an opportunity to speak.

At least eight of those people wrote to Bosma to complain that they were not given an adequate opportunity to speak, said Jodi Perras, a spokeswoman for the Sierra Club, which opposed the bill.

Those who did testify said the legislation would have discouraged people from buying and installing solar panels because it would becom harder to recoup their investment.

But supporters – mostly utilities – said companies are paying retail rates rather than wholesale rates for power produced by customers.

The committee approved the bill despite concerns from a number of lawmakers who said the bill still needed work.

Bosma said Tuesday the legislation wasn’t ready for passage.

“It just didn’t seem like the right time,” Bosma said. “Maybe next year.”

Lesley Weidenbener is executive editor of TheStatehouseFile.com, a news website powered by Franklin College journalism students.

Print Friendly, PDF & Email

Share This Post

One Response to Speaker kills bill criticized as detrimental to solar, wind energy usage

  1. Why does the Speaker have the authority to pull the bill when it has passed the Committee? Why not let it come to the floor, be debated and let the chips fall where they may?